Even the perma-bull analysts covering Tesla warned of sorely disappointing results in Q1, a view signaled by the poor deliveries for the quarter reported in early April.
But the numbers released after the market close on April 22 were much, much worse than expected. Automotive sales tumbled 20% over the same period last year to $14 billion.
Despite a strong 12-month gain in the industrial and residential battery storage franchise, overall revenues plunged 9%. Falling sales hammered profitability, sending net income down nearly 40% to a piddling $409 million, far below the over $600 million forecast by Wall Street.

Following the poor, but not nearly as bad Q4 report, this writer introduced a new concept for measuring Tesla’s repeatable, bedrock earnings generated by its current businesses—almost exclusively comprising cars and batteries, plus a small services unit.
To get there, I eliminated such one-time gains as a big tax benefit in the final quarter of 2023, and a noncash profit on the $600 million write-up of its Bitcoin holdings in Q4. I also eliminated earnings from the sale of regulatory credits to competing carmakers, a benefit that Musk himself says will prove ephemeral.
What we’ll call hardcore profits show just how much of Tesla’s gigantic—currently $812 billion—market cap is justified by what it’s doing now, though its present business is declining, and how much owes to what’s theoretically to come–the full self-driving vehicles and software and robotaxis Musk keeps promising. So far, those assurances have proved a constantly receding horizon.

In the past quarter, Tesla lost money on ‘hardcore’ businesses
To get to that number, I started with net earnings of $409 million, and subtracted its after-tax profit from the sale of regulatory credits. That figure is $433 million, and accounts for over 100% of Tesla’s total profits. For the past four quarters, Tesla has posted a “hardcore,” hopefully “repeatable” number of $3.5 billion.
Hence, it’s now selling at an adjusted P/E of over 230 (the $812 billion valuation divided by my profit number of $3.5 billion). By the way, at its peak in 2022, Tesla’s “hardcore figure” for the year was almost $12 billion, over three times what it achieved in the past 12 months.
Let’s give the car-battery business a P/E of 20, twice the global industry average, just to be generous. That puts the worth of its currently up-and-running operations at $70 billion.
The entire difference of $742 billion is essentially a blind vote of confidence that Musk will deliver years of earnings growth from here seldom witnessed in the annals of capitalism and never achieved by a player of Tesla’s age and size.
If you want a 10% return going forward, Tesla’s stock price would need to double from today’s $235 to $470 in seven years. Of course, Musk’s machine got there just a couple of months ago. But the future looks a lot dimmer now than it did in the heady days following Trump’s election. Hitting the worth means Tesla’s market cap must also double, to over $1.6 trillion.
At a, once again, generous forecast of a 30 P/E, the net earnings required are well over $50 billion. Cars won’t do it. Tesla would need to earn half of what Apple generates now on franchises that still haven’t advanced from the drawing board to the start-up phase.

It looks like Musk once again is fogging investors’ minds
The Tesla Q1 press release blamed the miserable performance on “uncertainty in the automotive and energy markets [that] continues to increase as rapidly evolving trade policy adversely impacts global supply chain and cost structure of Tesla and our peers.” In other words, Tesla is blaming Musk’s boss in the White House.
But in the minds of Tesla fans, Musk once again saved the day. The Q1 statement announced the EV giant would indeed launch the long-awaited, affordable, apparently all-new Model Y by mid-2025, and would introduce a fleet of robotaxis in its hometown of Austin in 2026.
The market is cheering, at least for now. In after-hours trading on April 22, Tesla gained 3.5% following a 4.6% jump during the day.
In the movie musical The Music Man, slick salesman Harold Hill charmed the good townspeople of mythical River City into paying up for carloads of trombones and clarinets that were always just about to arrive. Hill’s wordplay instilled visions of a great marching band that intoxicated his audience.
The Music Man’s got nothing on Elon Musk.
News
Why US Pilots Called the Australian SAS The Saviors from Nowhere?
Phantoms in the Green Hell Prologue: The Fall The Vietnam War was a collision of worlds—high technology, roaring jets, and…
When the NVA Had Navy SEALs Cornered — But the Australia SAS Came from the Trees
Ghosts of Phuoc Tuy Prologue: The Jungle’s Silence Phuoc Tuy Province, 1968. The jungle didn’t echo—it swallowed every sound, turning…
What Happened When the Aussie SAS Sawed Their Rifles in Half — And Sh0cked the Navy SEALs
Sawed-Off: Lessons from the Jungle Prologue: The Hacksaw Moment I’d been in country for five months when I saw it…
When Green Berets Tried to Fight Like Australia SAS — And Got Left Behind
Ghost Lessons Prologue: Admiration It started with admiration. After several joint missions in the central Highlands of Vietnam, a team…
What Happens When A Seasoned US Colonel Witnesses Australian SAS Forces Operating In Vietnam?
The Equation of Shadows Prologue: Doctrine and Dust Colonel Howard Lancaster arrived in Vietnam with a clipboard, a chest full…
When MACV-SOG Borrowed An Australian SAS Scout In Vietnam – And Never Wanted To Return Him
Shadow in the Rain: The Legend of Corporal Briggs Prologue: A Disturbance in the Symphony The arrival of Corporal Calum…
End of content
No more pages to load






